United Federation of Churches, LLC - Revision history

Maestro grandeur: moved lawsuits to "The Satanic Temple" page

2021-12-14T02:51:17Z

moved lawsuits to "The Satanic Temple" page

Maestro grandeur: /* Lawsuits */

2021-12-10T05:38:45Z

Lawsuits

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, 10 December 2021
Line 134:		Line 134:
	\|-		\|-
	\|6/23/2015		\|6/23/2015
	\|[[The Satanic Temple et al v. Jeremiah Jay Nixon et al.]] ("Mary Doe" II)		\|[[The Satanic Temple et al v. Jeremiah Jay Nixon et al.]] ("Mary Doe II")
	\|US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri		\|US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
	\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7760360/the-satanic-temple-v-jeremiah-jay-nixon/ 4:2015cv00986]		\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7760360/the-satanic-temple-v-jeremiah-jay-nixon/ 4:2015cv00986]

Maestro grandeur: /* Lawsuits */ swapping the federal and state Mary Doe cases

2021-11-02T06:34:26Z

Lawsuits: swapping the federal and state Mary Doe cases

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:34, 2 November 2021
Line 132:		Line 132:
	''Judge David Campbell ruled the Satanic Temple did not prove the city had denied its request because of its religious beliefs.'' [https://apnews.com/article/3d00de948174ad7c0a36093f1fdf1752 (AP summary)]</ref>		''Judge David Campbell ruled the Satanic Temple did not prove the city had denied its request because of its religious beliefs.'' [https://apnews.com/article/3d00de948174ad7c0a36093f1fdf1752 (AP summary)]</ref>
	\|Appeal made by [[The Satanic Temple Inc]]		\|Appeal made by [[The Satanic Temple Inc]]
			\|-
			\|6/23/2015
			\|[[The Satanic Temple et al v. Jeremiah Jay Nixon et al.]] ("Mary Doe" II)
			\|US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
			\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7760360/the-satanic-temple-v-jeremiah-jay-nixon/ 4:2015cv00986]
			\|Dismissed (failure)
			\|Affirmed (failure) <ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6155672/the-satanic-temple-v-mike-parson/ 16-3387], ''08/28/2018 Open Document JUDGMENT FILED - The judgment of the Originating Court is AFFIRMED in accordance with the opinion. ROGER L. WOLLMAN, MICHAEL J. MELLOY and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER Hrg Sep 2017 [4698520] [16-3387] (AMT) [Entered: 08/28/2018 07:49 AM]'', US Eighth Circuit of Appeals</ref>

	\|-		\|-
	\|05/11/2015		\|05/11/2015
	\|[[Mary Doe v. Jeremiah J Nixon et al]] ("Mary Doe II")		\|[[Mary Doe v. Jeremiah J Nixon et al]] ("Mary Doe I")
	\|Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri		\|Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri
	\|[https://www.courts.mo.gov/cnet/caseNoSearch.do 15AC-CC00205]		\|[https://www.courts.mo.gov/cnet/caseNoSearch.do 15AC-CC00205]
Line 141:		Line 149:

	State Supreme Court affirmed (failure) <ref>[https://www.courts.mo.gov/casenet/cases/searchDockets.do SC96751], ''Mary Doe appeals the circuit court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice her second amended petition seeking to enjoin the enforcement of the portion of the Missouri Informed Consent Law... This Court affirms denial of Ms. Doe’s request for injunctive relief. The informed consent law does not adopt any religious tenet, as Ms. Doe claimed. ...Moreover, the informed consent law neither requires a pregnant woman to read the booklet in question nor requires her to have or pay for an ultrasound. It simply provides her with that opportunity. .. The circuit court did not err in dismissing Ms. Doe’s petition for failure to state a claim.'' ([https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=136817 PDF])</ref><ref name=":1" />		State Supreme Court affirmed (failure) <ref>[https://www.courts.mo.gov/casenet/cases/searchDockets.do SC96751], ''Mary Doe appeals the circuit court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice her second amended petition seeking to enjoin the enforcement of the portion of the Missouri Informed Consent Law... This Court affirms denial of Ms. Doe’s request for injunctive relief. The informed consent law does not adopt any religious tenet, as Ms. Doe claimed. ...Moreover, the informed consent law neither requires a pregnant woman to read the booklet in question nor requires her to have or pay for an ultrasound. It simply provides her with that opportunity. .. The circuit court did not err in dismissing Ms. Doe’s petition for failure to state a claim.'' ([https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=136817 PDF])</ref><ref name=":1" />
	\|-
	~~\|6/23/2015~~
	~~\|[[The Satanic Temple et al v. Jeremiah Jay Nixon et al.]] ("Mary Doe I")~~
	~~\|US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri~~
	~~\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7760360/the-satanic-temple-v-jeremiah-jay-nixon/ 4:2015cv00986]~~
	~~\|Dismissed (failure)~~
	\|Affirmed (failure) <ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6155672/the-satanic-temple-v-mike-parson/ 16-3387], ''08/28/2018 Open Document JUDGMENT FILED - The judgment of the Originating Court is AFFIRMED in accordance with the opinion. ROGER L. WOLLMAN, MICHAEL J. MELLOY and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER Hrg Sep 2017 [4698520] [16-3387] (AMT) [Entered: 08/28/2018 07:49 AM]'', US Eighth Circuit of Appeals</ref>
	\|-		\|-
	\|3/24/2015		\|3/24/2015

Bossgod: /* Lawsuits */ added Courtlistener links

2021-10-01T07:51:44Z

Lawsuits: added Courtlistener links

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:51, 1 October 2021
Line 97:		Line 97:
	\|[[United Federation of Churches LLC v. Johnson et al]]		\|[[United Federation of Churches LLC v. Johnson et al]]
	\|US District Court for the Western District of Washington		\|US District Court for the Western District of Washington
	\|[https://~~dockets~~.~~justia~~.com/docket/~~washington~~/~~wawdce~~/~~2:2020cv00509/285026~~ 2:2020cv00509]		\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17042463/united-federation-of-churches-llc-v-johnson/ 2:2020cv00509]
	\|Initial dismissal[https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/UnitedFednofChurchesLLCvJohnsonNo220cv00509RAJ2021BL69458WDWashFe][https://casetext.com/case/united-fedn-of-churches-llc-v-johnson];		\|Initial dismissal[https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/UnitedFednofChurchesLLCvJohnsonNo220cv00509RAJ2021BL69458WDWashFe][https://casetext.com/case/united-fedn-of-churches-llc-v-johnson];
	complaint re-filed[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/33342602/United_Federation_of_Churches_LLC_v_Johnson_et_al]		complaint re-filed[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/33342602/United_Federation_of_Churches_LLC_v_Johnson_et_al]
Line 105:		Line 105:
	\|[[United Federation of Churches LLC v. Netflix, Inc. et al]]		\|[[United Federation of Churches LLC v. Netflix, Inc. et al]]
	\|US District Court for the Southern District of New York		\|US District Court for the Southern District of New York
	\|[https://~~dockets~~.~~justia~~.com/docket/~~new~~-~~york/nysdce/1:2018cv10372~~/~~504335~~ 1:2018cv10372]		\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8152228/united-federation-of-churches-llc-v-netflix-inc/ 1:2018cv10372]
	\|Settled Out of Court (victory) <ref name="Bloomberg" /><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/26138833/United_Federation_of_Churches_LLC_v_Netflix,_Inc_et_al PacerMonitor.com], United Federation of Churches LLC v. Netflix, Inc. et al</ref>		\|Settled Out of Court (victory) <ref name="Bloomberg" /><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/26138833/United_Federation_of_Churches_LLC_v_Netflix,_Inc_et_al PacerMonitor.com], United Federation of Churches LLC v. Netflix, Inc. et al</ref>
	\|<nowiki>-</nowiki>		\|<nowiki>-</nowiki>
Line 127:		Line 127:
	\|[[Satanic Temple et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al]]		\|[[Satanic Temple et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al]]
	\|US District Court of Arizona - Phoenix		\|US District Court of Arizona - Phoenix
	\|[https://~~dockets~~.~~justia~~.com/docket/~~arizona~~/~~azdce/2:2018cv00621~~/~~1082663~~ 2:2018cv00621]		\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6726362/satanic-temple-v-scottsdale-city-of/ 2:2018cv00621]
	\|~~Failed~~<ref>[https://www.~~pacermonitor~~.com/~~public~~/~~case~~/~~23799324~~/~~Satanic_Temple_et_al_v_Scottsdale,_City_of_et_al 20~~-~~15338~~] -		\|Judgment in favor of Defendants (failure)<ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6726362/92/satanic-temple-v-scottsdale-city-of/ CourtListener.com], ''ORDER AND JUDGMENT: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on all of Plaintiffs' claims. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/05/2020. (REK) (Entered: 02/06/2020)''</ref><ref>[https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/scottsdale/2020/02/29/scottsdale-wins-court-battle-against-satanists-over-invocation/4903564002/ Scottsdale wins court battle against Satanists over right to give invocation; Satanists appeal, Arizona Republic], Feb. 29, 2020. ''A U.S. District Court judge ruled this month that Scottsdale did not discriminate against the Satanic Temple when the city blocked a member of the group from giving an invocation before a City Council meeting in 2016.''
	~~Case Filed~~: ~~Feb 26, 2018; Terminated~~: ~~Feb~~ 06, 2020</ref><ref>[https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/scottsdale/2020/02/29/scottsdale-wins-court-battle-against-satanists-over-invocation/4903564002/ Scottsdale wins court battle against Satanists over right to give invocation; Satanists appeal, Arizona Republic], Feb. 29, 2020. ''A U.S. District Court judge ruled this month that Scottsdale did not discriminate against the Satanic Temple when the city blocked a member of the group from giving an invocation before a City Council meeting in 2016.''

	''Judge David Campbell ruled the Satanic Temple did not prove the city had denied its request because of its religious beliefs.'' [https://apnews.com/article/3d00de948174ad7c0a36093f1fdf1752 (AP summary)]</ref>		''Judge David Campbell ruled the Satanic Temple did not prove the city had denied its request because of its religious beliefs.'' [https://apnews.com/article/3d00de948174ad7c0a36093f1fdf1752 (AP summary)]</ref>
Line 146:		Line 145:
	\|[[The Satanic Temple et al v. Jeremiah Jay Nixon et al.]] ("Mary Doe I")		\|[[The Satanic Temple et al v. Jeremiah Jay Nixon et al.]] ("Mary Doe I")
	\|US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri		\|US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
	\|[https://~~dockets~~.~~justia~~.com/docket/~~missouri~~/~~moedce~~/~~4:2015cv00986/140483~~ 4:2015cv00986]		\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7760360/the-satanic-temple-v-jeremiah-jay-nixon/ 4:2015cv00986]
	\|Dismissed (failure)		\|Dismissed (failure)
	\|Affirmed (failure) <ref>[https://~~dockets~~.~~justia~~.com/docket/~~missouri~~/~~moedce~~/~~4:2015cv00986/140483~~ 16-3387], ''08/28/2018 Open Document JUDGMENT FILED - The judgment of the Originating Court is AFFIRMED in accordance with the opinion. ROGER L. WOLLMAN, MICHAEL J. MELLOY and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER Hrg Sep 2017 [4698520] [16-3387] (AMT) [Entered: 08/28/2018 07:49 AM]'', US Eighth Circuit of Appeals</ref>		\|Affirmed (failure) <ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6155672/the-satanic-temple-v-mike-parson/ 16-3387], ''08/28/2018 Open Document JUDGMENT FILED - The judgment of the Originating Court is AFFIRMED in accordance with the opinion. ROGER L. WOLLMAN, MICHAEL J. MELLOY and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER Hrg Sep 2017 [4698520] [16-3387] (AMT) [Entered: 08/28/2018 07:49 AM]'', US Eighth Circuit of Appeals</ref>
	\|-		\|-
	\|3/24/2015		\|3/24/2015
	\|[[Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. et al v. Franklin County, Indiana]]<ref>United Federation of Churches LLC d/b/a The Satanic Temple was a plaintiff on the case, however, both it and the [[Freedom from Religion Foundation]] were represented by Gavin Minor Rose with the ACLU of Indiana</reF>		\|[[Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. et al v. Franklin County, Indiana]]<ref>United Federation of Churches LLC d/b/a The Satanic Temple was a plaintiff on the case, however, both it and the [[Freedom from Religion Foundation]] were represented by Gavin Minor Rose with the ACLU of Indiana</reF>
	\|US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana		\|US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
	\|[https://~~dockets~~.~~justia~~.com/docket/indiana/~~insdce/1:2015cv00484/57558~~ 1:2015cv00484]		\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13307466/freedom-from-religion-foundation-inc-v-franklin-county-indiana/ 1:2015cv00484]
	\|Settled Out of Court (victory) <ref>[https://www.indystar.com/story/news/2015/12/21/satanic-temple-lawsuit-over-nativity-scene-dismissed/77693518/ IndyStar], "Satanic Temple lawsuit over Nativity scene dismissed", Dec. 31, 2015. ''As part of the settlement, the county agreed to let nonresidents apply for a permit, but they must have a local contact''</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210208013949/https://thomasmoresociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/FFRF-v-Franklin-Co-1-15-cv-00484-Fully-Executed-Settlement-Agreement-1.pdf Thomas More Society], Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of Claims</ref><ref>[https://www.eaglecountryonline.com/news/local-news/lawsuit-settlement-in-place-for-satanic-display-at-courthouse/ Eagle 99.3 FM], "Lawsuit Settlement In Place For Satanic Display At Courthouse" Dec. 18, 2015. ''According to the settlement, Franklin County has agreed to amend its ordinance concerning displays at the courthouse within 30 days. The amended ordinance for the courthouse display permitting process will accept the designation of a local contact in lieu of requiring that sponsorship be wholly by citizens of Franklin County. Essentially, The Satanic Temple could put up its goat-head display at the courthouse if it finds a resident of Franklin County or any adjacent Indiana county (Dearborn, Ripley, Rush, Decatur, Fayette, or Union counties) willing to serve as that local contact. The contact must be a person who lives or works in Franklin County and assumes responsibility for the display.''</ref>		\|Settled Out of Court (victory) <ref>[https://www.indystar.com/story/news/2015/12/21/satanic-temple-lawsuit-over-nativity-scene-dismissed/77693518/ IndyStar], "Satanic Temple lawsuit over Nativity scene dismissed", Dec. 31, 2015. ''As part of the settlement, the county agreed to let nonresidents apply for a permit, but they must have a local contact''</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210208013949/https://thomasmoresociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/FFRF-v-Franklin-Co-1-15-cv-00484-Fully-Executed-Settlement-Agreement-1.pdf Thomas More Society], Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of Claims</ref><ref>[https://www.eaglecountryonline.com/news/local-news/lawsuit-settlement-in-place-for-satanic-display-at-courthouse/ Eagle 99.3 FM], "Lawsuit Settlement In Place For Satanic Display At Courthouse" Dec. 18, 2015. ''According to the settlement, Franklin County has agreed to amend its ordinance concerning displays at the courthouse within 30 days. The amended ordinance for the courthouse display permitting process will accept the designation of a local contact in lieu of requiring that sponsorship be wholly by citizens of Franklin County. Essentially, The Satanic Temple could put up its goat-head display at the courthouse if it finds a resident of Franklin County or any adjacent Indiana county (Dearborn, Ripley, Rush, Decatur, Fayette, or Union counties) willing to serve as that local contact. The contact must be a person who lives or works in Franklin County and assumes responsibility for the display.''</ref>
	\|}		\|}

Bossgod: /* Lawsuits */ changed to AP version

2021-09-07T07:56:48Z

Lawsuits: changed to AP version

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:56, 7 September 2021
Line 131:		Line 131:
	Case Filed: Feb 26, 2018; Terminated: Feb 06, 2020</ref><ref>[https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/scottsdale/2020/02/29/scottsdale-wins-court-battle-against-satanists-over-invocation/4903564002/ Scottsdale wins court battle against Satanists over right to give invocation; Satanists appeal, Arizona Republic], Feb. 29, 2020. ''A U.S. District Court judge ruled this month that Scottsdale did not discriminate against the Satanic Temple when the city blocked a member of the group from giving an invocation before a City Council meeting in 2016.''		Case Filed: Feb 26, 2018; Terminated: Feb 06, 2020</ref><ref>[https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/scottsdale/2020/02/29/scottsdale-wins-court-battle-against-satanists-over-invocation/4903564002/ Scottsdale wins court battle against Satanists over right to give invocation; Satanists appeal, Arizona Republic], Feb. 29, 2020. ''A U.S. District Court judge ruled this month that Scottsdale did not discriminate against the Satanic Temple when the city blocked a member of the group from giving an invocation before a City Council meeting in 2016.''

	''Judge David Campbell ruled the Satanic Temple did not prove the city had denied its request because of its religious beliefs.''[https://~~webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:CLRu82vyyIgJ:https://www.azcentral~~.com/~~story/news/local/scottsdale/2020/02/29/scottsdale-wins-court-battle-against-satanists-over-invocation/4903564002~~/~~+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us Cached~~]</ref>		''Judge David Campbell ruled the Satanic Temple did not prove the city had denied its request because of its religious beliefs.'' [https://apnews.com/article/3d00de948174ad7c0a36093f1fdf1752 (AP summary)]</ref>
	\|Appeal made by [[The Satanic Temple Inc]]		\|Appeal made by [[The Satanic Temple Inc]]
	\|-		\|-

Bossgod: /* Officer History */

2021-07-22T08:56:49Z

Officer History

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 22 July 2021
Line 38:		Line 38:
	==Officer History==		==Officer History==
	{\| class="wikitable floatleft"		{\| class="wikitable floatleft"
	\|+ style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: none;" \| Listed Officers for United Federation of Churches LLC By Year <Ref name ="MA SOS">[https://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/~~CorpSearchFormList~~.aspx?sysvalue=~~9gr67UrCwZ.oMoa.bZWvVA-~~- Massachusetts Secretary of State], filings for United Federation of Churches LLC, ID Number 001127600 </ref>		\|+ style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: none;" \| Listed Officers for United Federation of Churches LLC By Year <Ref name ="MA SOS">[https://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSummary.aspx?sysvalue=9kp5dqzTSt0jbYQEV9kdTswZ2QL6AH_LXMf99hAcl3c- Massachusetts Secretary of State], filings for United Federation of Churches LLC, ID Number 001127600 </ref>
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="col" \| Year !! scope="col" \| Douglas<br>Misicko !! scope="col" \| Doug<br>Mesner !! scope="col" \| Cevin<br>Soling !! scope="col" \| Malcom<br>Jarry		! scope="col" \| Year !! scope="col" \| Douglas<br>Misicko !! scope="col" \| Doug<br>Mesner !! scope="col" \| Cevin<br>Soling !! scope="col" \| Malcom<br>Jarry

Bossgod: /* Officer History */

2021-07-22T08:44:18Z

Officer History

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 22 July 2021
Line 40:		Line 40:
	\|+ style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: none;" \| Listed Officers for United Federation of Churches LLC By Year <Ref name ="MA SOS">[https://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSearchFormList.aspx?sysvalue=9gr67UrCwZ.oMoa.bZWvVA-- Massachusetts Secretary of State], filings for United Federation of Churches LLC, ID Number 001127600 </ref>		\|+ style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: none;" \| Listed Officers for United Federation of Churches LLC By Year <Ref name ="MA SOS">[https://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSearchFormList.aspx?sysvalue=9gr67UrCwZ.oMoa.bZWvVA-- Massachusetts Secretary of State], filings for United Federation of Churches LLC, ID Number 001127600 </ref>
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="col" \| Year !! scope="col" \| Douglas Misicko !! scope="col" \| Doug Mesner !! scope="col" \| Cevin Soling !! scope="col" \| Malcom Jarry		! scope="col" \| Year !! scope="col" \| Douglas<br>Misicko !! scope="col" \| Doug<br>Mesner !! scope="col" \| Cevin<br>Soling !! scope="col" \| Malcom<br>Jarry
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="row" \| 2014		! scope="row" \| 2014
Line 70:		Line 70:
	\|}		\|}

	In the earliest filings, the only two officers listed were Misicko and Soling. However, in the May 2018 Restated Certificate of Organization, "Doug Mesner" was the registered agent and "Malcolm Jarry" was manager, with "Jarry" signing as the applicant; in 2019, Misicko was listed as registered agent but "Mesner" was also a listed officer along with "Jarry", who again signed the document. In 2020, Soling signed the annual report, and "Jarry" was listed only in regards to the real property. In 2021, again only Misicko and Soling were listed as officers and signatories of the annual report.<Ref name="MA SOS"></ref>		In the earliest filings, the only two officers listed were Misicko and Soling. However, in the May 2018 Restated Certificate of Organization, "Doug Mesner" was the registered agent and "Malcolm Jarry" was manager, with "Jarry" signing as the applicant; in 2019, Misicko was listed as registered agent but "Mesner" was also a listed officer along with "Jarry", who again signed the document. In 2020, Soling signed the annual report, and "Jarry" was listed only in regards to the real property.

			In 2021, again only Misicko and Soling were listed as officers and signatories of the annual report.<Ref name="MA SOS"></ref>

	"The Satanic Temple" Federal EIN 46-5030690 is distinct from [[The Satanic Temple Inc]], FEIN 82-3404757, which the Massachusetts Secretary of State lists as owned solely by Misicko. In 2019, "The Satanic Temple Inc" became the first Satanic church to achieve Public Charity Status under [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/170 Section 170(b)(1)(A)(i)], "a church or a convention or association of churches." <ref>[https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/detailsPage?ein=823404757&name=Satanic%20Temple&city=Salem&state=MA&countryAbbr=US&dba=&type=CHARITIES,%20DETERMINATIONLETTERS&orgTags=CHARITIES&orgTags=DETERMINATIONLETTERS IRS.gov], The Satanic Temple (sic), FEIN 82-3404757, Salem, MA, determination letter ruling 02/06/2019, "990 - Not required to file (church)"</ref><ref>[https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/detailsPage?ein=824719513&name=Ordo%20Sororitatis%20Satanicae&city=Ballwin&state=MO&countryAbbr=US&dba=&type=CHARITIES,%20DETERMINATIONLETTERS,%20EPOSTCARD&orgTags=CHARITIES&orgTags=DETERMINATIONLETTERS&orgTags=EPOSTCARD IRS.gov], [[Ordo Sororitatis Satanicae]], EIN: 82-4719513 \| Ballwin, MO, determination letter ruling 04/11/2018, "990 - Required to file Form 990-N - Income less than $25,000 per year"</ref> However, GuideStar.org lists "The Satanic Temple" and an EIN matching "The Satanic Temple Inc" to have the principal officer "Lucien Greaves" (sic) and co-principal officer "Malcolm Jarry" (sic), but it's not obvious what documents that references as the Form 990s were not publicly available.<ref>[https://www.guidestar.org/profile/82-3404757 GuideStar.org], ruling year 2019</ref>		"The Satanic Temple" Federal EIN 46-5030690 is distinct from [[The Satanic Temple Inc]], FEIN 82-3404757, which the Massachusetts Secretary of State lists as owned solely by Misicko. In 2019, "The Satanic Temple Inc" became the first Satanic church to achieve Public Charity Status under [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/170 Section 170(b)(1)(A)(i)], "a church or a convention or association of churches." <ref>[https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/detailsPage?ein=823404757&name=Satanic%20Temple&city=Salem&state=MA&countryAbbr=US&dba=&type=CHARITIES,%20DETERMINATIONLETTERS&orgTags=CHARITIES&orgTags=DETERMINATIONLETTERS IRS.gov], The Satanic Temple (sic), FEIN 82-3404757, Salem, MA, determination letter ruling 02/06/2019, "990 - Not required to file (church)"</ref><ref>[https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/detailsPage?ein=824719513&name=Ordo%20Sororitatis%20Satanicae&city=Ballwin&state=MO&countryAbbr=US&dba=&type=CHARITIES,%20DETERMINATIONLETTERS,%20EPOSTCARD&orgTags=CHARITIES&orgTags=DETERMINATIONLETTERS&orgTags=EPOSTCARD IRS.gov], [[Ordo Sororitatis Satanicae]], EIN: 82-4719513 \| Ballwin, MO, determination letter ruling 04/11/2018, "990 - Required to file Form 990-N - Income less than $25,000 per year"</ref> However, GuideStar.org lists "The Satanic Temple" and an EIN matching "The Satanic Temple Inc" to have the principal officer "Lucien Greaves" (sic) and co-principal officer "Malcolm Jarry" (sic), but it's not obvious what documents that references as the Form 990s were not publicly available.<ref>[https://www.guidestar.org/profile/82-3404757 GuideStar.org], ruling year 2019</ref>

Bossgod: /* Officer History */

2021-07-22T08:42:23Z

Officer History

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:42, 22 July 2021
Line 38:		Line 38:
	==Officer History==		==Officer History==
	{\| class="wikitable floatleft"		{\| class="wikitable floatleft"
	\|+ ~~style=~~style="~~border~~:~~1px solid #BBB~~;margin:~~.46em 0 0 .2em~~" \| Listed Officers for United Federation of Churches LLC By Year <Ref name ="MA SOS">[https://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSearchFormList.aspx?sysvalue=9gr67UrCwZ.oMoa.bZWvVA-- Massachusetts Secretary of State], filings for United Federation of Churches LLC, ID Number 001127600 </ref>		\|+ style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: none;" \| Listed Officers for United Federation of Churches LLC By Year <Ref name ="MA SOS">[https://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSearchFormList.aspx?sysvalue=9gr67UrCwZ.oMoa.bZWvVA-- Massachusetts Secretary of State], filings for United Federation of Churches LLC, ID Number 001127600 </ref>
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="col" \| Year !! scope="col" \| Douglas Misicko !! scope="col" \| Doug Mesner !! scope="col" \| Cevin Soling !! scope="col" \| Malcom Jarry		! scope="col" \| Year !! scope="col" \| Douglas Misicko !! scope="col" \| Doug Mesner !! scope="col" \| Cevin Soling !! scope="col" \| Malcom Jarry

Bossgod: /* Officer History */ Jarry has been Reg Agent since 2018, made table float

2021-07-22T08:35:50Z

Officer History: Jarry has been Reg Agent since 2018, made table float

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, 22 July 2021
Line 37:		Line 37:

	==Officer History==		==Officer History==
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable floatleft"
	\|+ style="~~text-align~~: ~~left~~;" \| Listed Officers for United Federation of Churches LLC By Year <Ref name ="MA SOS">[https://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSearchFormList.aspx?sysvalue=9gr67UrCwZ.oMoa.bZWvVA-- Massachusetts Secretary of State], filings for United Federation of Churches LLC, ID Number 001127600 </ref>		\|+ style=style="border:1px solid #BBB;margin:.46em 0 0 .2em" \| Listed Officers for United Federation of Churches LLC By Year <Ref name ="MA SOS">[https://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSearchFormList.aspx?sysvalue=9gr67UrCwZ.oMoa.bZWvVA-- Massachusetts Secretary of State], filings for United Federation of Churches LLC, ID Number 001127600 </ref>
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="col" \| Year !! scope="col" \| Douglas Misicko !! scope="col" \| Doug Mesner !! scope="col" \| Cevin Soling !! scope="col" \| Malcom Jarry		! scope="col" \| Year !! scope="col" \| Douglas Misicko !! scope="col" \| Doug Mesner !! scope="col" \| Cevin Soling !! scope="col" \| Malcom Jarry

Bossgod: /* Lawsuits */ updated wikitable style

2021-07-22T07:39:05Z

Lawsuits: updated wikitable style

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:39, 22 July 2021
Line 82:		Line 82:

	The following list is non-exhaustive and includes several cases represented by lawyers of The Satanic Temple but did not include them as plaintiffs.		The following list is non-exhaustive and includes several cases represented by lawyers of The Satanic Temple but did not include them as plaintiffs.
	{\| class="~~article-table~~"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|+		\|+ style="text-align: left;" \| Court Cases
	Court Cases		\|-
	!Filed		! scope="col" \| Date Filed
	!Case Name		! scope="col" \| Case Name
	!Original Jurisdiction		! scope="col" \| Original Jurisdiction
	!Case Number		!scope="col" \| Case Number
	!Result		!scope="col" \| Result
	!Appeal		!scope="col" \| Appeal
	\|-		\|-
	\|4/03/2020		\|4/03/2020