The Satanic Temple Inc - Revision history

Overlord: creating TST Health Inc section

2023-07-29T05:22:39Z

creating TST Health Inc section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:22, 29 July 2023
Line 45:		Line 45:
	<blockquote>The Satanic Temple, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Your donation is tax-deductible in accordance with IRS rules and regulations. The Federal Tax ID is 82-3404757.<ref>[https://thesatanictemple.com/collections/contribute-to-the-satanic-temple-campaigns TheSatanicTemple.com], "Donate"</ref><ref>https://thesatanictemple.com/collections/tst-v-texas/products/religious-reproductive-rights-legal-aid-fund</ref> </blockquote>		<blockquote>The Satanic Temple, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Your donation is tax-deductible in accordance with IRS rules and regulations. The Federal Tax ID is 82-3404757.<ref>[https://thesatanictemple.com/collections/contribute-to-the-satanic-temple-campaigns TheSatanicTemple.com], "Donate"</ref><ref>https://thesatanictemple.com/collections/tst-v-texas/products/religious-reproductive-rights-legal-aid-fund</ref> </blockquote>

	==Fundraising==		==Samuel Alito's Mom's Satanic Abortion Clinic Inc. / TST Health Inc==
			In New Mexico, The Satanic Temple Inc. is registered with the doing business as names "Samuel Alito's Mom's Satanic Abortion Clinic Inc. / TST Health Inc."<ref>[https://portal.sos.state.nm.us/BFS/online/CorporationBusinessSearch New Mexico Secretary of State], business ID# 7035080</ref>. Originally organized in New Mexico Nov. 22, 2022, the only governing officer was first listed as the [[Cevin Soling]] pseudonym "Malcolm Jarry" as director. By January 2023, Douglas Misicko had been added as another director, both under his government name and his pseudonym "Lucien Greaves", but as two separate people with separate addresses. Misicko was also listed as president and treasurer under his government name, which is how the registry stands [https://the.satanic.wiki/images/d/dd/New_Mexico_Corporations_Division_7035080_TST_Health_Inc.pdf as of July 2023].

			In [[The Satanic Temple v. Holcolmb\|The Satanic Temple's Indiana abortion challenge]], TST claimed that their abortion clinic had "prescribed Abortifacients to over two dozen patients" between February 1, 2023, and June 8, 2023, an average of about six patients per month.<ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65364722/50/2/the-satanic-temple-inc-v-rokita/ CourtListener.com], Exhibit B - Plaintiffs Non-Confidential Response to Defendants First Set of Inte — Document #50, Attachment #2,
			:'''INTERROGATORY NO. 3''': ''Identify the number of persons to whom The Abortion Clinic has provided abortion inducing drugs, the type and quantity of such drugs provided, and the location where the drugs were provided during the relevant timeframe.''
			:'''RESPONSE''': ''Plaintiff objects to this Interrogatory on the grounds it seeks information beyond the scope of Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(b)(1). Subject to this objection and without waiving it, the Abortion Clinic has prescribed Abortifacients to over two dozen patients since it became operational in February 2023.''</ref>

			In the same document, TST claimed no licensed physicians were employed by or contracted by the abortion clinic, and described its expenses as, "Paying contractors employed by the Abortion Clinic, including attorneys, APRN’s and other support persons and the purchase of computers and telecommunications
			equipment and related services."

			==Fundraising (incomplete)==
	{\| class="wikitable sortable"		{\| class="wikitable sortable"
	\|+ style="text-align: left;" \| Fundraising Campaigns (incomplete)		\|+ style="text-align: left;" \| Fundraising Campaigns (incomplete)

Maestro grandeur: moved lawsuits to "The Satanic Temple" page

2021-12-14T02:50:57Z

moved lawsuits to "The Satanic Temple" page

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 In the online store for TheSatanicTemple.com, products such as [https://thesatanictemple.com/collections/hoodies hoodies], [https://thesatanictemple.com/collections/new-satan/products/the-satanic-temple-official-hot-sauce-4-pack hot sauce], and most items in the collection "[https://thesatanictemple.com/collections/tst-v-texas TST V. Texas]" proceed as typical sales. However, donation pages such as "Contribute To The Satanic Temple" or items listed as "Contribute to the Religious Reproductive Rights Legal Aid Fund" include the following text:
 <blockquote>The Satanic Temple, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Your donation is tax-deductible in accordance with IRS rules and regulations. The Federal Tax ID is 82-3404757.<ref>[https://thesatanictemple.com/collections/contribute-to-the-satanic-temple-campaigns TheSatanicTemple.com], "Donate"</ref><ref>https://thesatanictemple.com/collections/tst-v-texas/products/religious-reproductive-rights-legal-aid-fund</ref> </blockquote>
 ==Fundraising==
@@ Line 110: / Line 72: @@
 |No
 |}
 ==References==
 <references />
 [[Category:Incorporated Entities]]

Bossgod: /* Lawsuits */ Clarifying that there are two Belle Plaine cases, has failed at District Court level and is now being appealed

2021-10-01T07:27:32Z

Lawsuits: Clarifying that there are two Belle Plaine cases, has failed at District Court level and is now being appealed

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:27, 1 October 2021
Line 56:		Line 56:
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="row" \| 2/04/2021		! scope="row" \| 2/04/2021
	\|[[Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of]] \|\| US District Court for the District of Minnesota \|\|[https://~~dockets~~.~~justia~~.com/docket/~~minnesota~~/~~mndce~~/~~0:2021cv00336/192453~~ 0:2021cv00336] \|\| ~~Ongoing~~<ref>[https://www.~~pacermonitor~~.com/~~public~~/~~case~~/~~38166822~~/~~Satanic_Temple~~,~~_Inc~~,~~_The_v_City_of_Belle_Plaine,_MN 0:~~21-cv-~~00336] -~~		\|[[Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of\| Satanic Temple, Inc v. Belle Plaine, City of]] ("Satanic Temple II")\|\| US District Court for the District of Minnesota \|\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59240138/satanic-temple-inc-the-v-city-of-belle-plaine-mn/ 0:2021cv00336] \|\| Dismissed and Sanctioned (failure)<ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59240138/43/satanic-temple-inc-the-v-city-of-belle-plaine-mn/ CourtListener.com], ''Defendant’s motion for sanctions in Satanic Temple II, No. 21-cv-0336, (Dkt. 17), is GRANTED.'' </ref> \|\| Appealed (Ongoing)<ref name="Belle Plaine appeal">[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/41883898/The_Satanic_Temple_v_City_of_Belle_Plaine,_et_al 0:21-cv-03079], Case filed: Sept. 16, 2021, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals</ref>
	~~Case Filed: Feb 04~~, ~~2021~~</ref><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/~~27959837~~/~~Satanic_Temple,_The_v_Belle_Plaine~~,~~_City_of_et_al~~ 0:19-cv-~~01122~~] - Case ~~Filed~~: ~~Apr 25, 2019</ref>, 9/10 counts dismissed<ref>[https://www.startribune~~.~~com/satanic-temple-lawsuit-against-belle-plaine-will-move-forward-despite-court-dismissal-of-most-of-its-claims/572010332/?refresh=true StarTribune.com]~~, ~~''Satanic Temple lawsuit against Belle Plaine will move forward~~, ~~despite court dismissal~~ of ~~most of its claims; 1 of 10 counts still remains in the Scott County battle over church and state'', Aug. 4, 2020~~</ref> ~~\|\| -~~
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="row" \| 1/20/2021		! scope="row" \| 1/20/2021
	\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. City of Boston]]		\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. City of Boston]]
	\|US District Court of Massachusetts - Boston		\|US District Court of Massachusetts - Boston
	\|[https://~~dockets~~.~~justia~~.com/docket/~~massachusetts~~/~~madce~~/~~1:2021cv10102/229706~~ 1:21-cv-10102]		\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/31223191/the-satanic-temple-inc-v-city-of-boston/ 1:21-cv-10102]
	\|Ongoing<ref>[https://www.universalhub.com/2021/satanists-allowed-continue-press-claim-way-city UniversalHub.com], ''Satanists allowed to continue to press claim that the way the City Council picks clergy for invocations is unconstitutional'', July 21, 2021</ref><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/37984635/The_Satanic_Temple,_Inc_v_City_of_Boston, 0:21-cv-00336] - Case Filed: Feb 04, 2021</ref>		\|Ongoing<ref>[https://www.universalhub.com/2021/satanists-allowed-continue-press-claim-way-city UniversalHub.com], ''Satanists allowed to continue to press claim that the way the City Council picks clergy for invocations is unconstitutional'', July 21, 2021</ref><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/37984635/The_Satanic_Temple,_Inc_v_City_of_Boston, 0:21-cv-00336] - Case Filed: Feb 04, 2021</ref>
	\| -		\| -
Line 72:		Line 71:
	\|Terminated (Unclear)<ref>[https://caseinfo.arcourts.gov/cconnect/PROD/public/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?backto=C&case_id=04CV-20-2100&begin_date=&end_date= 04CV-20-2100] - Case Filed: Sep. 27, 2020; [https://web.archive.org/web/20210520054832/https://contexte.aoc.arkansas.gov/imaging/IMAGES/DMS/CK_Image.Present2?DMS_ID=C1520BBC8A01E75D790FB8CBD91388441378F38F4E9F2CA99747DFB43A95B8CBA9AD539D7BA6940D86B479E061824217D0BB406894028B58F7DF3AA8BF973CBD&i_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontexte.aoc.arkansas.gov%2Fimaging%2FIMAGES%2FDMS Terminated]: Feb 26, 2021 via [https://casetext.com/rule/arkansas-court-rules/arkansas-rules-of-civil-procedure/rule-41-dismissal-of-actions#:~:text=Rule%2041%20%2D%20Dismissal%20of%20Actions%20(a)Voluntary%20Dismissal%3B,trial%20is%20by%20the%20court. voluntary dismissal (without prejudice)]</ref><ref>[https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/the-satanic-temple-bought-11971116 Dallas Observer], "Satanists Posted a Dallas Billboard Advocating for Reproductive Rights: 'Abortions Save Lives!'" Dec. 22, 2020, ''In September, TST sued Lamar Advertising Co. for religious discrimination because it had refused to post the religious organization’s designs. The advertising giant denies the temple’s initial allegations, according to a TST press release. Although Goodwin can’t comment on the active lawsuit, she said TST ultimately struck a deal with billboard company Clear Channel Outdoor.''</ref>		\|Terminated (Unclear)<ref>[https://caseinfo.arcourts.gov/cconnect/PROD/public/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?backto=C&case_id=04CV-20-2100&begin_date=&end_date= 04CV-20-2100] - Case Filed: Sep. 27, 2020; [https://web.archive.org/web/20210520054832/https://contexte.aoc.arkansas.gov/imaging/IMAGES/DMS/CK_Image.Present2?DMS_ID=C1520BBC8A01E75D790FB8CBD91388441378F38F4E9F2CA99747DFB43A95B8CBA9AD539D7BA6940D86B479E061824217D0BB406894028B58F7DF3AA8BF973CBD&i_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontexte.aoc.arkansas.gov%2Fimaging%2FIMAGES%2FDMS Terminated]: Feb 26, 2021 via [https://casetext.com/rule/arkansas-court-rules/arkansas-rules-of-civil-procedure/rule-41-dismissal-of-actions#:~:text=Rule%2041%20%2D%20Dismissal%20of%20Actions%20(a)Voluntary%20Dismissal%3B,trial%20is%20by%20the%20court. voluntary dismissal (without prejudice)]</ref><ref>[https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/the-satanic-temple-bought-11971116 Dallas Observer], "Satanists Posted a Dallas Billboard Advocating for Reproductive Rights: 'Abortions Save Lives!'" Dec. 22, 2020, ''In September, TST sued Lamar Advertising Co. for religious discrimination because it had refused to post the religious organization’s designs. The advertising giant denies the temple’s initial allegations, according to a TST press release. Although Goodwin can’t comment on the active lawsuit, she said TST ultimately struck a deal with billboard company Clear Channel Outdoor.''</ref>
	\| -		\| -
			\|-
			! scope="row" \| 4/25/2019
			\|[[Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of\|Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of]] ("Satanic Temple I")\|\| US District Court for the District of Minnesota \|\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15064653/satanic-temple-the-v-belle-plaine-city-of/ 0:19-cv-01122-WMW-JFD] \|\| Dismissed (failure)<ref>[https://www.startribune.com/satanic-temple-lawsuit-against-belle-plaine-will-move-forward-despite-court-dismissal-of-most-of-its-claims/572010332/?refresh=true StarTribune.com], ''Satanic Temple lawsuit against Belle Plaine will move forward, despite court dismissal of most of its claims; 1 of 10 counts still remains in the Scott County battle over church and state'', Aug. 4, 2020</ref><ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15064653/109/satanic-temple-the-v-belle-plaine-city-of/ CourtListener.com], ''ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's promissory-estoppel claim in Satanic Temple I, No. 19-cv-1122 81 is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff's motion to strike in Satanic Temple I, No. 19-cv- 1122 100 is DENIED. 3. The magistrate judge's January 26, 2021 Order in Satanic Temple I, No. 19-cv-1122 79 is AFFIRMED. 4. Defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint in Satanic Temple II, No. 21-cv-0336 10 is GRANTED. 5. Plaintiff 039;s motion to strike in Satanic Temple II, No. 21-cv-0336 29 is DENIED. 6. Defendant's motion for sanctions in Satanic Temple II, No. 21-cv-0336 17 is GRANTED. Within fourteen days after the date of this Order, Defendant shall file a mot ion and supporting evidence as to the attorneys' fees Defendant incurred responding to the complaint and seeking sanctions in Satanic Temple II, No. 21-cv-0336. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 9/15/2021. Associated Cases: 0:19-cv-01122-WMW-JFD, 0:21-cv-00336-WMW-JFD (RJE)'' </ref> \|\| Appealed (ongoing)<ref name="Belle Plaine appeal"></ref>
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="row" \| 2/26/2018		! scope="row" \| 2/26/2018
	\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc., et al v. City of Scottsdale]]		\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc., et al v. City of Scottsdale]]
	\|US District Court of Arizona - Phoenix		\|US District Court of Arizona - Phoenix
	\|[https://~~dockets~~.~~justia~~.com/docket/~~arizona~~/~~azdce~~/~~2:2018cv00621/1082663~~ 2:2018cv00621]		\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6726362/satanic-temple-v-scottsdale-city-of/ 2:2018cv00621]
	\|Failed<ref>Case begun by [[United Federation of Churches, LLC]]</ref>		\|Failed<ref>Case begun by [[United Federation of Churches, LLC]]</ref>
	\|Affirmed (failure)<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fO3ojPSA7I Video of Oral Arguments to 20-15338 The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale]</ref><ref>[https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2021/05/19/appeals-court-upholds-ruling-blocking-satanist-invocation-in-scottsdale-az/ Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Blocking Satanist Invocation in Scottsdale (AZ)], by Hemant Mehta for Friendly Atheist</ref><ref>[https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2021/05/19/20-15338.pdf United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision] upholding lower court ruling</ref>		\|Affirmed (failure)<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fO3ojPSA7I Video of Oral Arguments to 20-15338 The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale]</ref><ref>[https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2021/05/19/appeals-court-upholds-ruling-blocking-satanist-invocation-in-scottsdale-az/ Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Blocking Satanist Invocation in Scottsdale (AZ)], by Hemant Mehta for Friendly Atheist</ref><ref>[https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2021/05/19/20-15338.pdf United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision] upholding lower court ruling</ref>

Maestro grandeur: /* Lawsuits */ added updated to Hellerstedt

2021-09-29T23:57:48Z

Lawsuits: added updated to Hellerstedt

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 29 September 2021
Line 53:		Line 53:
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="row" \| 2/05/2021		! scope="row" \| 2/05/2021
	\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc. et al v. Hellerstedt et al]] \|\| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas \|\|[https://~~dockets~~.~~justia~~.com/docket/~~texas~~/~~txsdce~~/~~4:2021cv00387/1813841~~ 4:21-cv-00387] \|\| Ongoing \|\| -		\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc. et al v. Hellerstedt et al]] \|\| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas \|\|[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59182019/the-satanic-temple-inc-v-hellerstedt/ 4:21-cv-00387] \|\| Ongoing, 2/4 counts dismissed<ref>[https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59182019/33/the-satanic-temple-inc-v-hellerstedt/ CourtListener.com], Aug. 6th, 2021, ''Plaintiffs The Satanic Temple, Inc and Ann Doe withdrew their claims asserted under Count 2 as to the Equal Protection Clause. They also noted no objection to the dismissal of their claims under Count 4 as to the Texas Religious Freedom and Restoration Act for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Counts 2 and 4 were DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Without objection, Texas HHSC was DISMISSED from this action because the TRFRA was the only claim asserted against it.''</ref> \|\| -
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="row" \| 2/04/2021		! scope="row" \| 2/04/2021

Bossgod: /* Lawsuits */ adding Belle Plaine dismissal note

2021-09-07T08:09:14Z

Lawsuits: adding Belle Plaine dismissal note

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:09, 7 September 2021
Line 57:		Line 57:
	! scope="row" \| 2/04/2021		! scope="row" \| 2/04/2021
	\|[[Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of]] \|\| US District Court for the District of Minnesota \|\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/minnesota/mndce/0:2021cv00336/192453 0:2021cv00336] \|\| Ongoing<ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/38166822/Satanic_Temple,_Inc,_The_v_City_of_Belle_Plaine,_MN 0:21-cv-00336] -		\|[[Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of]] \|\| US District Court for the District of Minnesota \|\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/minnesota/mndce/0:2021cv00336/192453 0:2021cv00336] \|\| Ongoing<ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/38166822/Satanic_Temple,_Inc,_The_v_City_of_Belle_Plaine,_MN 0:21-cv-00336] -
	Case Filed: Feb 04, 2021</ref><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27959837/Satanic_Temple,_The_v_Belle_Plaine,_City_of_et_al 0:19-cv-01122] - Case Filed: Apr 25, 2019</ref> \|\| -		Case Filed: Feb 04, 2021</ref><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27959837/Satanic_Temple,_The_v_Belle_Plaine,_City_of_et_al 0:19-cv-01122] - Case Filed: Apr 25, 2019</ref>, 9/10 counts dismissed<ref>[https://www.startribune.com/satanic-temple-lawsuit-against-belle-plaine-will-move-forward-despite-court-dismissal-of-most-of-its-claims/572010332/?refresh=true StarTribune.com], ''Satanic Temple lawsuit against Belle Plaine will move forward, despite court dismissal of most of its claims; 1 of 10 counts still remains in the Scott County battle over church and state'', Aug. 4, 2020</ref> \|\| -
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="row" \| 1/20/2021		! scope="row" \| 1/20/2021

Bossgod: /* Fundraising */ updated to new wikitable

2021-07-22T08:13:32Z

Fundraising: updated to new wikitable

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:13, 22 July 2021
Line 82:		Line 82:

	==Fundraising==		==Fundraising==
	{\| class="~~article-table~~ sortable"		{\| class="wikitable sortable"
	\|+Fundraising Campaigns (incomplete)		\|+ style="text-align: left;" \| Fundraising Campaigns (incomplete)
	!Year		!Year
	!Name		!Name

Bossgod: /* Lawsuits */ added update to Boston suit, updated table to new style

2021-07-22T07:53:36Z

Lawsuits: added update to Boston suit, updated table to new style

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:53, 22 July 2021
Line 46:		Line 46:
	==Lawsuits==		==Lawsuits==
	The Satanic Temple Inc. has been involved in at least five [[lawsuits]] since its formation, including continuing cases begun by United Federation of Churches LLC.		The Satanic Temple Inc. has been involved in at least five [[lawsuits]] since its formation, including continuing cases begun by United Federation of Churches LLC.
	{\| class="~~article-table~~"
	\|+Court Cases		{\| class="wikitable"
	~~!Filed~~		\|+ style="text-align: left;" \| Court Cases
	~~!Case name~~
	~~!Original Jurisdiction~~
	~~!Case Number~~
	~~!Result~~
	~~!Appeal~~
	\|-		\|-
	\|2/05/2021		! scope="col" \| Date Filed !! scope="col" \| Case name !! scope="col" \| Original Jurisdiction !! scope="col" \| Case Number !! scope="col" \| !! scope="col" \| Result !! scope="col" \| Appeal
	\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc. et al v. Hellerstedt et al]]		\|-
	\|US District Court for the Southern District of Texas		! scope="row" \| 2/05/2021
	\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/texas/txsdce/4:2021cv00387/1813841 4:21-cv-00387]		\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc. et al v. Hellerstedt et al]] \|\| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas \|\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/texas/txsdce/4:2021cv00387/1813841 4:21-cv-00387] \|\| Ongoing \|\| -
	\|Ongoing
	\| -
	\|-		\|-
	\|2/04/2021		! scope="row" \| 2/04/2021
	\|[[Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of]]		\|[[Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of]] \|\| US District Court for the District of Minnesota \|\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/minnesota/mndce/0:2021cv00336/192453 0:2021cv00336] \|\| Ongoing<ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/38166822/Satanic_Temple,_Inc,_The_v_City_of_Belle_Plaine,_MN 0:21-cv-00336] -
	\|US District Court for the District of Minnesota		Case Filed: Feb 04, 2021</ref><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27959837/Satanic_Temple,_The_v_Belle_Plaine,_City_of_et_al 0:19-cv-01122] - Case Filed: Apr 25, 2019</ref> \|\| -
	\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/minnesota/mndce/0:2021cv00336/192453 0:2021cv00336]
	\|Ongoing<ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/38166822/Satanic_Temple,_Inc,_The_v_City_of_Belle_Plaine,_MN 0:21-cv-00336] -
	Case Filed: Feb 04, 2021</ref><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27959837/Satanic_Temple,_The_v_Belle_Plaine,_City_of_et_al 0:19-cv-01122] - Case Filed: Apr 25, 2019</ref>
	\| -
	\|-		\|-
	\|1/20/2021		! scope="row" \| 1/20/2021
	\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. City of Boston]]		\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. City of Boston]]
	\|US District Court of Massachusetts - Boston		\|US District Court of Massachusetts - Boston
	\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/massachusetts/madce/1:2021cv10102/229706 1:21-cv-10102]		\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/massachusetts/madce/1:2021cv10102/229706 1:21-cv-10102]
	\|Ongoing<ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/37984635/The_Satanic_Temple,_Inc_v_City_of_Boston, 0:21-cv-00336] - Case Filed: Feb 04, 2021</ref>		\|Ongoing<ref>[https://www.universalhub.com/2021/satanists-allowed-continue-press-claim-way-city UniversalHub.com], ''Satanists allowed to continue to press claim that the way the City Council picks clergy for invocations is unconstitutional'', July 21, 2021</ref><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/37984635/The_Satanic_Temple,_Inc_v_City_of_Boston, 0:21-cv-00336] - Case Filed: Feb 04, 2021</ref>
	\| -		\| -
	\|-		\|-
	\|9/27/2020		! scope="row" \| 9/27/2020
	\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. Lamar Advertising of Louisiana, LLC]]		\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. Lamar Advertising of Louisiana, LLC]]
	\|19th West Circuit Court 5 (Benton County, Ark.)		\|19th West Circuit Court 5 (Benton County, Ark.)
Line 84:		Line 73:
	\| -		\| -
	\|-		\|-
	\|2/26/2018		! scope="row" \| 2/26/2018
	\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc., et al v. City of Scottsdale]]		\|[[The Satanic Temple, Inc., et al v. City of Scottsdale]]
	\|US District Court of Arizona - Phoenix		\|US District Court of Arizona - Phoenix

Bossgod: /* Lawsuits */ moved note to reference

2021-06-27T09:35:54Z

Lawsuits: moved note to reference

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:35, 27 June 2021
Line 88:		Line 88:
	\|US District Court of Arizona - Phoenix		\|US District Court of Arizona - Phoenix
	\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/arizona/azdce/2:2018cv00621/1082663 2:2018cv00621]		\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/arizona/azdce/2:2018cv00621/1082663 2:2018cv00621]
	\|Case begun by [[United Federation of Churches, LLC]]		\|Failed<ref>Case begun by [[United Federation of Churches, LLC]]</ref>
	\|Affirmed (failure)<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fO3ojPSA7I Video of Oral Arguments to 20-15338 The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale]</ref><ref>[https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2021/05/19/appeals-court-upholds-ruling-blocking-satanist-invocation-in-scottsdale-az/ Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Blocking Satanist Invocation in Scottsdale (AZ)], by Hemant Mehta for Friendly Atheist</ref><ref>[https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2021/05/19/20-15338.pdf United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision] upholding lower court ruling</ref>		\|Affirmed (failure)<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fO3ojPSA7I Video of Oral Arguments to 20-15338 The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale]</ref><ref>[https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2021/05/19/appeals-court-upholds-ruling-blocking-satanist-invocation-in-scottsdale-az/ Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Blocking Satanist Invocation in Scottsdale (AZ)], by Hemant Mehta for Friendly Atheist</ref><ref>[https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2021/05/19/20-15338.pdf United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision] upholding lower court ruling</ref>
	\|}		\|}

Maestro grandeur: added category

2021-06-26T01:35:56Z

added category

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 26 June 2021
Line 122:		Line 122:
	==References==		==References==
	<references />		<references />
			[[Category:Incorporated Entities]]

Maestro grandeur: fixed title

2021-06-24T01:40:41Z

fixed title

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 24 June 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Incorporated Entities		{{Incorporated Entities

	\| title=~~{PageName}~~		\| title=The Satanic Temple Inc

	\| image=[[File:The_Satanic_Temple.png\|250px]]		\| image=[[File:The_Satanic_Temple.png\|250px]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:09, 7 September 2021
Line 57:		Line 57:
	! scope="row" \| 2/04/2021		! scope="row" \| 2/04/2021
	\|[[Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of]] \|\| US District Court for the District of Minnesota \|\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/minnesota/mndce/0:2021cv00336/192453 0:2021cv00336] \|\| Ongoing<ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/38166822/Satanic_Temple,_Inc,_The_v_City_of_Belle_Plaine,_MN 0:21-cv-00336] -		\|[[Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of]] \|\| US District Court for the District of Minnesota \|\|[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/minnesota/mndce/0:2021cv00336/192453 0:2021cv00336] \|\| Ongoing<ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/38166822/Satanic_Temple,_Inc,_The_v_City_of_Belle_Plaine,_MN 0:21-cv-00336] -
	Case Filed: Feb 04, 2021</ref><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27959837/Satanic_Temple,_The_v_Belle_Plaine,_City_of_et_al 0:19-cv-01122] - Case Filed: Apr 25, 2019</ref> \|\| -		Case Filed: Feb 04, 2021</ref><ref>[https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27959837/Satanic_Temple,_The_v_Belle_Plaine,_City_of_et_al 0:19-cv-01122] - Case Filed: Apr 25, 2019</ref>, 9/10 counts dismissed<ref>[https://www.startribune.com/satanic-temple-lawsuit-against-belle-plaine-will-move-forward-despite-court-dismissal-of-most-of-its-claims/572010332/?refresh=true StarTribune.com], ''Satanic Temple lawsuit against Belle Plaine will move forward, despite court dismissal of most of its claims; 1 of 10 counts still remains in the Scott County battle over church and state'', Aug. 4, 2020</ref> \|\| -
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="row" \| 1/20/2021		! scope="row" \| 1/20/2021